Proof Why We Can’t Take Standard Womens Sizing Seriously

As women, what size clothing we wear dominates more of our time than it should, but do you know where it comes from? The origin may surprise you. Here are some interesting facts about standardized sizing that may have you laughing instead of crying the next time something does fit.

1. True sizing standards didn’t develop until the 1940’s

2. Originally sizes for young ladies and children were all based on age — so a size 16 would be for a 16-year-old

3. Women’s clothing sizes were originally based on their bust size

4. Sizing in the past assumed that the women in the house would know how to sew,and that they would adjust the dress accordingly.

5. In 1939 an article titled “No Boondoggling,”TIME explored the Department of Agriculture’s effort to standardize women’s clothes, an effort that had been inspired by the fact that U.S. manufacturers guessed it was costing them $10 million a year not to have set sizes.

6. Original sizing assumed all women had an hour glass figure.

7. Somewhere along the way standard sizing underwent a change. But not a perfect one. Although they changed the sizing they used the measurements of women who had served in the air force, some of the most fit people in the country.

8. “Sizes” were originally created by the government.

9. The average model size was a size 16’ in the 40’s to a 12 in the 60’s.

10. Sizing as we know it is called vanity sizing, manufacturers create sizing based on their own preferences.

We already gave a big you know what to sizing and all of its implied meanings, now are you convinced fit is what matters?


UnitedFront Is A Contemporary Lifestyle Brand For Sophisticated, Modern Women. We Feature Stylish Designs That Speak To Our Consumer’s Feminine Taste And Refined Style.

Leave a Reply